“Marketing as we practice it works really well when customers are dumb. When they’re smart, it doesn’t work as well. Technology has changed the world because it’s given customers access to the information. What can we tell them that they don’t already know or can’t find for themselves? That’s the real challenge for marketers. In six keystrokes and two-tenths of a second, every bit of information, anywhere in the world, is available to a consumer today: g-o-o-g-l-e.”
By extension, marketing now occurs at the speed of customers, not at the speed of competitors. “We love the four Ps because we control that system – we decide what we make, where we make it, when to make it, how much we’re going to charge for it, what to tell people about it… What’s driving us crazy is now consumers have that same knowledge and they’re essentially saying they want to be involved every step of the way.”
Apple is a great example of how a company can adapt to the open source movement. There are already thousands upon thousands of iPhone applications, each developed by a consumer who wanted to help create something that could be attached to Apple equipment.
Schultz shared insights from one of his longitudinal studies of media consumption. His latest research delves into the impact of foreground and background media: consumers are regularly simultaneously exposed to multiple forms of media but which media are they giving their attention to? Which mediums are accessed? Which do they prioritise? What media do they use in combination? What media has the greatest influence on product purchase?
He said: “What is an audience today? Is a TV audience people in the room with the set on or is it people talking back to the television? We buy full audiences but we might not get full attention. Are you watching TV while also flipping through a magazine or are you flipping through a magazine while simultaneously watching TV?
“Only the consumer can determine what they’re doing. We don’t know which one of multiple media they’re giving their attention to. They separate these things out; they create their own media systems for themselves.”
Schultz is convinced that the amount of time spent with media today is not as relevant as whether it is marketing intensive. For example, you are exposed to a dozen TV commercials during a two-hour movie versus you are exposed to a dozen messages in a five-minute period online.
“It’s about how intensive it is, not how much time you spend with the media. The problem we have of course is we equate time to importance and it may or may not be. So part of the issue here is we have to reinvent the way we think about media and media distribution.”
In closing, Schultz rallied for marketers to get back to the future. “All of the traditional measurement systems rely on historical attitudinal data. We’ve got really great measures for yesterday but practically nothing for tomorrow. We need to build predictive models. We in marketing continue to use old models simply because they’re in place. Everyone agrees with them; no one knows what they mean… we deal with smoke, mirrors and myths and that’s part of our problem.”
Back to Marketing Update home page
Seen at the breakfast seminar ... |